Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,809 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 114 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
114 structured nearby appeal records.
114 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
For (a) rear extension to existing dwelling. (B) attic conversion for storage space. (C) rear dormer window to roof to existing two storey dwelling including all associated site works. This dwelling is a protected structure. (National Inventory of Architectural Heritage Ref: No 22830296
For a dormer style dwelling with ancillary site works (as previously granted under planning ref. no. 9719)to rear of numbers 11-15 Eldon Terrace, Waterford with access through existing entrance servicing existing house " Eureka" Johns Hill Waterford
The extension of site (permitted development under planning ref. 20/441), to include the enclosed garden to the rear of site together with closing up of the existing gate, the formation of a new entrance and all associated site works on the site of a Protected Structure
For subdivision of the site of a Protected Structure together with construction of new two storey family dwelling, new vehicular entrance onto public road, connection to public services, boundary treatment and all associated site works at
The construction of a single storey extension to the rear of the existing school building, A Protected Structure (Ref RPS 475) to accommodate additional staff toilet facilities, along with all associated site works
(a) alterations and extension of existing ground floor rear extension comprising an additional 28m sq floor area at ground level, (b) alterations and extension of existing first floor rear extension comprising an additional 20m sq floor area at first floor level, (c) alterations and extension of existing flat roof dormer to the rear, (d) the forming of 1 no. new window to the side of existing dwelling at first floor level and (e) the erection of a new part 2 metre high wall and part 2 metre high timber fence to rear garden boundaries
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,809 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 23174The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief