Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
11% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 637 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 46 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
46 structured nearby appeal records.
46 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
Indefinite retention of enclosed porch to front of existing dwelling
Two Storey Extension & Alterations to our House, including, relocation of front door, new living room, remodeled kitchen/dining and new master bedroom, and all associated site works
Change to a new two storey house type at sites no. 48, 49, 50 & 51, this application is a modification to previously approved residential development planning reference 22/398 and 24/60566
Permission is sought for indefinite retention of extended dining room to side, extended bay windows to kitchen and utility with extended balcony over to rear, change from flat roof to pitched roof over rear area adjoining swimming pool, extended bay window to swimming pool at front and amended railing type to 3 balconies to front elevation.
Change to house type F, from a bungalow to a two storey dwelling at sites no. 42, 43, 44 & 45, this application is a modification to previously approved residential development planning reference 22/398 and 24/60566
The construction of 99no. dwellings as phase 3 of the Sea Cove residential development comprising of 32no. semi-detached and 5no. detached two-storey 4-bedroom houses, 46no. semi-detached two-storey 3-bedroom houses, 2no. two-storey duplex blocks with a total of 8no. ground floor and 8no. first floor 2-bedroom apartments, together with all associated site works and the omission of a three-storey 6-bedroom detached house (type C1), a two-storey 4-bedroom detached house (type A1) and 2no. three-storey apartment buildings with 11no. units in each as previously approved under original application 22/398 for phase 1 of this development
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 637 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2360647The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief