Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage10 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
10 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
13 Grange Park Avenue , Grange Upper , Waterford City
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,782 decisions within 5 km, 10 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 113 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 2460710
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage113 structured nearby appeal records.
113 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
1,782Nearby applications
10Site-linked candidates
12%Nearby refused
113Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
2460710
For the change of use of existing garage/playroom to an independent single storey living unit with rear extension to said unit, roof overhang amendments, the creation of a new boundary wall between existing house and new proposed dwelling and all associated site works
22558
A 1m wide access gate in the boundary wall to the rear
19963
The erection of extensions and alterations to existing dwelling house comprising of; alterations to existing front elevation, first floor extension to side of existing dwelling, demolition of existing sunroom and 2-storey bay to rear and construction of new ground and first floor rear extensions, and all other associated site works at
18145
Elevational modifications to existing house comprising alterations to window openings to front elevation, conversion of existing garage, new patio area to front, new canopy to front door and enlargement of existing flat roof dormer
21488
As built extension to rear of dwelling together with permission for first floor extension to side of dwelling, new canopy to front entrance, elevational changes, connection to on-site services and all associated site works
1944
To retain indefinitely the entrance porch as is built to the front of house
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,782 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2460710The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief