Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage16 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
16 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
8% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 2,398 decisions within 5 km, 16 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 210 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
16 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
16 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Limerick County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Limerick County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Limerick County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
210 structured nearby appeal records.
210 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Limerick County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
A). To demolish the existing rear extension to the existing dwelling house; b). to construct a new extension to the side and rear of the house; c). make alterations to the existing house; d). construct a new standalone garden room; e). all associated site works and services
Revisions to the development previously authorised under planning permission ref no. 2461233 Specifically; a) To reduce floor area of the authorised GF rear extension to the existing dwelling house; b). to change floor area of the authorised 1F extension to the existing dwelling house; c). to change floor area and position of authorised standalone garden room; d). all associated site works and services
The conversion of the existing attic space for storage use, together with the construction of new dormer roof windows to the side and rear elevations
The construction of a two storey extension to the side and rear of the dwelling and all ancillary site works
Conversion of existing attached garage into family room and shower room, including kitchen extension to side and rear of the house
Demolition of existing single storey garage to side of house and construction of a two storey extension to the side of house together with all associated site works. Retention Permission is also sought for the widening of vehicular entrance to front of the site
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 2,398 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2461233The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief