Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage10 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
10 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
8% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 2,652 decisions within 5 km, 10 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 228 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
10 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
10 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Limerick County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Limerick County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Limerick County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
228 structured nearby appeal records.
228 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Limerick County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
The change of use of ground floor and basement floor premises from retail to restaurant use, and the change of use of first floor and second floor accommodation from office use to residential use. The application includes proposed amendments to the existing building roof line and the existing building elevations. The completed refurbishment works will include 4 no. 1 bedroom apartments and 2 no. 2 bedroom apartments above a restaurant premises
The proposed development that involves renovating the current premises and extending into premises of no. 2 William Street. Works include the incorporation of a new façade and refurbishment of both premises and partial removal of the existing party wall of retail unit(Formerly H. Samuels Jewellers) site. Additionally, the project includes refurbishing the roof and all associated site works
Change of shopfront and signage
• Provision of a new entrance door on the north western elevation to provide access to O’Connell Street; • Alterations to the north western and north eastern elevations at ground floor level, including the replacement to provide new tenant signage
The replacement of existing illuminated fascia signage to the Cruises Street shopfront
A change of use of ground floor from the current use as a butcher's shop to use as a restaurant with a take-away facility; the installation of extract ducting to the basement area, within open area and new signage to the front elevation. This building is a protected structure, RPS No. 3564
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 2,652 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2461298The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief