Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
5% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 211 decisions within 5 km, 4 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 9 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Clare County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Clare County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Clare County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
9 structured nearby appeal records.
9 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Clare County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
Of the following works: a) retention of the light engineering workshop in the old seaweed factory building. b) retention of the new side cladding and access doors to old sea-weed factory building. c) retention of the existing palisade fencing and entrance gates. d) retention of the existing storage area. e) retention of the existing carparking. Please note that these works will be carried out within the curtilage of an existing protected structure
To alter Condition No. 34 of P04-29 granted under Kilrush Town Council. This will involve changing House No. 2 from it's use as a holiday home to its use as a permanent residence
For development which will consist of (1) the demolition of existing extensions to front, LHS, RHS and rear of original cottage, (2) the retrofit of original cottage, (3) the provision of a new extension to LHS of original cottage, (4) the provision of a garage, carport and externally covered areas to front and rear, (5) driveway entrance at position of existing agricultural entrance, and (6) all related site works
To alter condition No. 34 of P04/29 granted under Kilrush Town Council. This will involve changing House No. 3 from its use as a holiday home to its use as permanent residence.
To change use of property from holiday home to permanent residence
To alter Condition No. 34 of P04-29 granted under Kilrush Town Council. This will involve changing House No. 7 from its use as a holiday home to its use as permanent residence
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 211 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 25172The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief