Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage1 register record is within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
1 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Money , Carrowholly , Westport
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
14% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 284 decisions within 5 km, 1 exact-site or onsite candidate record, and 22 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 2652
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Confirmed coverageOne current citation from the Mayo County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matchedFlood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage22 structured nearby appeal records.
22 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Mayo County Council development plan.
1 matched284Nearby applications
1Site-linked candidates
14%Nearby refused
22Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
2652
Retain access road as constructed, construct stables, tackroom/canteen, fodder store with connection to effluent treatment system together with associated site services
2660287
Renovation and extension of existing property together with all ancillary site works.
2560737
Change of use from holiday home to permanent residential dwelling, including renovation and extension of existing property together with all ancillary site works.
20750
DEMOLISH EXISTING CONSERVATORY GRANTED UNDER P01/1672 AND TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED NEW LIVING ROOM EXTENSION TO EXISTING DWELLING HOUSE
18613
CONSTRUCT DOMESTIC GARAGE
18243
CONSTRUCT EXTENSIONS AND ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING DWELLING HOUSE AND TO EXISTING DOMESTIC GARAGE TO ACCOMMODATE GRANNY FLAT TOGETHER WITH ASSOCIATED SITE SERVICES
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 284 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2652The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief