Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Kimpton , Newtown Park , Newtown
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,827 decisions within 5 km, 4 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 112 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 2660309
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage112 structured nearby appeal records.
112 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
1,827Nearby applications
4Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
112Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
2660309
To construct a part two storey, part single storey extension. Part of the two-storey extension will be built above a single storey part of the existing house and to construct a vehicular entrance on the North Western boundary of the site and to close off the existing vehicular entrance with all associated site development works
1818
For works comprising the demolition of the existing single storey garage to the side (northwest) of the existing dwelling house and the construction of a new 2 storey extension tot he side (north west)and rear (northeast) of the existing dwelling house, together with all ancillary and associated site works
17782
Development consisting of the construction of a new two storey extension to the existing dwelling, reconfiguration of the existing house including elevation changes and first floor balcony to garden, new entrance and associated site works
21879
The construction of a rear single storey extension to the lower ground floor level of the existing dwelling house, internal and external alterations and modifications to lower ground floor level and second floor level. Permission is also sought for the demolition of part rear external walls to existing lower ground floor level, relocation of existing rear and front lower ground floor windows and all associated site works. 3 St. Andrews Terrace is included on the Record of Protected Structures, reference no. 320.
21191
The demolition of an existing single storey 5-bedroom detached dwelling house and the construction of a 2 storey 5 bedroom detached dwelling house to include, external car port, garage, new driveway, footpaths, landscaping and all associated site works
2560243
A) change of use of lower ground floor from dental surgery and part residential to beauty salon, b) single storey extension comprising lower ground floor treatment rooms formerly an open yard and fuel store to the rear, one car parking space to front of site. Also PLANNING PERMISSION for installation of a top floor rooflight to the rear dormer attic over stairwell also permission to form a roof garden with opaque glazed guarding 2m high for private use of the upper floor single residence, minor internal modifications comprising lobbies at ground floor level offices and new fire resisting partition at first floor landing.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,827 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2660309The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief