Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
11% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,044 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 78 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Kerry County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedOne current citation from the Kerry County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matched2 of 4 layers are loaded for Kerry County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
78 structured nearby appeal records.
78 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Kerry County Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
Permission to remove the existing portakabin, erect new changing rooms and storage building, all ancillary site works including connection to public services, access road and car parking
(a) alter existing perimeter fencing on west, north and east elevation of grounds, (b) erect advertising signage on fencing on north elevation of grounds, and (c) erect a safety cage around the existing hammer throwing circle
CONSTRUCT 2.NO. ENTRANCE/WING WALLS INCORPORATING INTEGRATED "ROSE HOTEL" SYMBOL/SIGN WITHIN EACH WALL WITH ANCILLARY BACK LIGHTING TO SYMBOL/SIGN AND ASSOCIATED PILLARS TO PROPOSED WING WALLS ALL LOCATED AT THE EXISTING VEHICULAR ENTRANCE TO THE ROSE HOTEL
INCREASE HEIGHT OF EXISTING BOUNDARY WALL ON EASTERN SIDE OF HOTEL WITH THE PROVISION OF PILLARS FINISHED IN PLASTER AND CONCRETE CAPPINGS ON TOP OF THE PROVISION OF PILLARS FINISHED IN PLASTER AND CONCRETE CAPPINGS ON TOP OF THE EXISTING BOUNDARY WALL WITH DECORATEVE METAL RAILIINGS BETWEEN THE PROPSOED PILLARS
CONSTRUCT A NEW SUNROOM EXTENSION FACING NORTH (DAN SPRING ROAD) AND ALL SITE DEVELOPMENT
CONSTRUCT AN ORNAMENTAL ARCH AND ASSOCIATED SUPPORTING PILLARS WITH LIGHTING AT THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE HOTEL CAR PARK ONTO DAN SPRING ROAD ALL AT THE ROSE HOTEL
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,044 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2660410The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief