Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage6 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
6 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
6% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 315 decisions within 5 km, 6 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 5 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
6 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
6 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedOne current citation from the Mayo County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matched2 of 4 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
5 structured nearby appeal records.
5 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Mayo County Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
EXTENSION TO EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING, REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING GARDEN TUNNELS, CARPARK, NEW ENTRANCE ACCESS ONTO PUBLIC ROAD, INCLUDING ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS AND SITE SERVICES, TOGETHER WITH RETENTION PERMISSION FOR DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF GROUND WORKS COMMENCED ON SITE
Single storey extension to existing retail building including restaurant & storage warehouse to rear.
CHANGE OF USE FROM A GROUND FLOOR RETAIL UNIT TO USE AS AN APARTMENT, AND FOR ALTERATIONS TO THE FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS
ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING PLANNING PERMISSION P17/979 TO CONSIST OF ALTERATIONS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ROOFED GARDEN DISPLAY AREA (TO REPLACE EXISTING ROOFED GARDEN DISPLAY AREA) TOGETHER WITH ALTERATIONS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CAR PARKING LAYOUT, CONSTRUCTION OF A STORAGE BUILDING AND FENCING TOGETHER WITH ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS AND SITE SERVICES
Change of use of the development previously approved under P21/838 to a single domestic dwelling house with one ground floor retail unit together with all ancillary site works and services
RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY TO CONSIST OF TWO GROUND FLOOR RETAIL UNITS, TWO FIRST FLOOR APARTMENTS AND TWO SECOND FLOOR APARTMENTS. TOGETHER WITH ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS AND SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS LODGED
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 315 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 17979The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief