Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage8 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
8 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
16% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 340 decisions within 5 km, 8 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 35 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
8 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
8 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
35 structured nearby appeal records.
35 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
The construction of a 2 storey extension to existing single storey dwelling, to provide a separate residential unit and part sub-division of existing dwelling
To demolish two existing domestic sheds and a self contained derelict former apartment to the rear of our existing dwelling, plus a new site entrance to serve the existing dwelling
For a single storey extension to the rear and PERMISSION for the construction of a link extension to the front and side elevations to connect the existing dwelling, new skylights to the rear roof of the existing attic space which will be used as a games room and all associated site works.
Permission to indefinitely retain sunroom to side of dwelling. along with permission for indefinite retention of modifications to front conservatory previously permitted under 07/1088
Development will consist of the demolition of an existing single storey dwelling, and the construction of a new single storey dwelling with connections to existing mains and foul water, landscaping, and all associated site works.
The construction of garden room at the side of existing dwelling and all associated site works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 340 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 18331The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief