Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage19 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
19 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Strand Road , Tramore , Co. Waterford
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 675 decisions within 5 km, 19 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 48 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 18845
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage48 structured nearby appeal records.
48 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
675Nearby applications
19Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
48Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
18845
To demolish existing structure - "The Gift Box Shop" and adjoining structures, and construct a two storey structure, comprising 4 no. Retail Units at ground floor level, and 3 no. Residential Apartments at first floor level, with passenger elevator. Amenity space, and 4 no. car park spaces (to rear of site) on existing site, with all associated site works
2560841
To make amendments to previously granted Planning Permission reference no: 2444 The proposed amendments are to replace the 3 number first floor apartments granted pemission with 5 number apartments comprising two studio apartments, two 2 bedroom apartments and one single bedroom apartment in accordance with the drawings submitted
2444
For Amendments to previously granted Planning application reference 18845. The Proposed amendments include (1) converting previously granted three no. ground floor retail units into 1 no. ground floor retail unit, maintaining the lower level commercial unit accessed from the east façade and all ancillary site works. ii) the removal of the ground floor window on the west facing façade. iii) Change two entrance doors on South facing façade into French doors. iv)removal of bin store and bin store access door on eastern façade. v) change of location of ramp and steps to allow for accessible floor level. vi) removal of the clear storey windows on the north, south and east facades for engineering and construction method. vii) changing from glazed guarding railing to a durable powder coated galvanised steel guarding railing. viii) change from galvanised steel guarding to concrete parapet guarding to allow for privacy in various locations. ix) changing of head height to all first floor windows and doors previously granted under PA ref 18845 to 2100mmfor domestic scale in proportion with the size of the rooms
19209
Development consisting of the installation of an ATM machine to the east elevation of the public toilets building
221052
To construct an apartment at first floor level with a 7.5m overall height over existing retail outlet with entrance opening onto Strand Road facing elevation and all ancillary site works.
2159
To construct an apartment at first floor level with a 7.5m overall height over existing retail outlet with entrance opening onto Strand Road facing elevation and all ancillary works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 675 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 18845The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief