Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage23 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
23 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
8% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 270 decisions within 5 km, 23 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 17 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
23 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
23 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Clare County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Clare County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Clare County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
17 structured nearby appeal records.
17 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Clare County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
For the following development: a) change of use of the existing building from disused hostel to ground floor cafe/restaurant with two no. apartments to the first and second floor; b) demolish existing rear extension; c) construct new rear extension; d) make elevational changes to the existing building; e) all associated site works and services
To amend the design and use of the development previously authorised under planning permission Ref No. P22-1165, to include the following: a) omit the proposed ground floor café restaurant and first and second floor apartments; b) to provide two. No. semi-detached townhouses; c) elevational and layout changes to accommodate the revised use; and d) all associated site works and services
- the development will consist of the installation of an ATM machine to the South East facing elevation
To renovate, alter and extend the existing dwelling house along with all associated site works
For change of use of former part residential/ part hair salon / part off-licence premises to proposed pharmacy/chemist use with live-in staff facilities
To sub-divide the existing dwelling to two independent dwelling houses for permanent occupancy and for part demolition of existing shed and rear extension with all necessary ancillary works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 270 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 221165The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief