Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage1 register record is within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
1 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,533 decisions within 5 km, 1 exact-site or onsite candidate record, and 102 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
1 register record is within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
1 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
102 structured nearby appeal records.
102 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
The construction of a new single storey fitness suite and coffee shop, complete with all associated ancillary works and associated site works
(a) Temporary Planning Permission for the relocation of existing vehicular and pedestrian site entrance previously granted Permission, Planning Reference number 16/446, and (b) Permission for the amendment to design of a grass flood lighted training area previously granted permission, Planning Reference number 17/101. All the above complete with all associated ancillary works and associated site works
RETENTION for an indefinite period of a small rear corridor extension and a domestic garage, rear door and windowand PERMISSION to construct a conservatory extension to existing dwelling
For temporary planning permission for the use of the existing vehicular and pedestrian site entrance previously granted Permission (Planning Reference number:19/391)
Material alterations and extension to dwelling, namely, for the construction of ground floor extension to rear of dwelling, for a first floor extension over existing single storey living area and for alterations to existing entrance porch and windows throughout and for replacement of existing roof, all with associated site development works
To replace 3 no. previously approved 3 storey apartment blocks (units 122-129, 154-161 & 140-147 incl) approved under planning reference 06/500313 (duration extended under planning ref. 17/623) with 3 no. 2 storey blocks containing 2 no. 1 bedroom units and 5 no. 2 bedroom units (21 units in total) together with all associated site works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,533 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 25180The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief