Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
REDHILL , TULRAHAN , CLAREMORRIS
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
3% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 97 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 1866
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Confirmed coverageOne current citation from the Mayo County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matchedFlood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3 structured nearby appeal records.
3 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Mayo County Council development plan.
1 matched97Nearby applications
2Site-linked candidates
3%Nearby refused
3Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
1866
RETENTION OF AS BUILT DWELLING HOUSE, DOMESTIC GARAGE AND DOMESTIC SHED TOGETHER WITH ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS AND SERVICES
19719
A SOIL POLISHING FILTER ANCILLARY TO THE EFFLUENT TREATMENT SYSTEM PREVIOUSLY GRANTED PERMISSION UNDER P18/66
2560916
Construction of a single storey extension to an existing property and conversion of existing attic incl. associated site works
19580
CONSTRUCT DWELLING HOUSE, WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM AND PERCOLATION AREA, DOMESTIC GARAGE TOGETHER WITH ALL ANCILLARY FACILITIES
22890
A HARDCORED AREA FOR OFF ROAD PARKING OF AGRI-MILK TANKER TRUCKS AND TRAILER TOGETHER WITH ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS AND SERVICES
2460676
Planning Permission to construct a dwelling house, garage and septic tank with percolation area, all as per drawing documentation submitted together with all ancillary site works and services.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 97 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 1866The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief