Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
46 Commons Grove , Dromiskin , Co. Louth
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
14% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 724 decisions within 5 km, 4 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 56 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 1985
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage56 structured nearby appeal records.
56 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
724Nearby applications
4Site-linked candidates
14%Nearby refused
56Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
1985
Retention permission to consist of the retention of 1 1/2 storey extension to rear of existing two storey dwelling house.
201026
Retention permission for a one and a half storey extension to rear of existing two storey dwelling house and all associated site development works
2460560
Permission for the demolition of an existing single storey dwelling with associated outbuildings and various agricultural structures and construction of 4no. single storey dwellings on a site of circa. 0.352 hectares. All dwellings are provided with private amenity space in the form of private gardens. The development includes provision of a new vehicular entrance and access road (vehicular and pedestrian access to the proposed development will be via The Commons Road), public open space, new boundary treatments, car parking areas, footpaths, foul and surface water drainage, watermains, site lighting, development naming feature, all associated / ancillary landscaping and site development works
2460774
Retention permission for rear/side extension to existing dwelling house
22934
Retention permission for a shed and full permission for the construction of a car garage and all other ancillary works
2560153
Permission for development consisting of a new single storey dwelling, new vehicular entrance, boundary treatments, foul and surface water drainage, watermains and all associated site development works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 724 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 1985The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief