Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage6 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
6 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
10% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 250 decisions within 5 km, 6 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 9 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
6 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
6 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Kilkenny County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Kilkenny County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Kilkenny County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
9 structured nearby appeal records.
9 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Kilkenny County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
For construction of 41 No. 2 storey semi-detached and terraced housing units, 8 No. residential serviced sites together with proposed boundary treatments. landscaping and all associated site development works. The proposed road network and services to connect to existing residential development known as Friary Walk, (Planning permission ref. 99-1809 & 10-458).
Is sought by Andrew Glennon for change of house type for 12 no. Units under previously granted planning reference number 10/458 & 16/186 and all associated site works at No. 1,3,4,5,6,8,9,11,12,14,15 & 16
For change of design for 2 no. House 'Type A' Units - under previously granted planning reference number 10/458 & 16/186 and all associated site development works at
For change of design for 4 no. House Type A Units - under previously granted planning reference number 10/458 and 16/186 and all associated site development works at No. 10, 11, 14 & No. 15
For the construction of 19 No. 2-storey semi-detached and terraced housing units, together with proposed boundary treatments, landscaping, and all associated site development works. The proposed road network and services to connect to existing residential development known as Friary Walk, (Planning permission ref.99-1809, 10-458, 16-186 & 20-189)
To construct a two-storey extension to the side of semi-detached dwelling comprising of a garage on the ground floor and a bedroom on the first floor and all associated site works on lands at
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 250 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 20189The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief