Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage1 register record is within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
1 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
5% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 300 decisions within 5 km, 1 exact-site or onsite candidate record, and 6 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
1 register record is within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
1 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Monaghan County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Monaghan County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Monaghan County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
6 structured nearby appeal records.
6 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Monaghan County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
Permission consisting of the refurbishing of the existing Hollywood Park in conjunction with Hollywood Development Association. The scheme will comprise of the following: (a) upgrading of the existing play area, replacement of the existing jetty, refurbishment of the existing toilet facilities and shelters and surfacing of the existing footpaths through the site (b) the existing gates, railings and fences will be repaired or replaced (c) new signage will be erected throughout the site along with new seating and picnic tables (d) carpark - replacement of existing boundary timber fence with weldmesh fencing. Install road kerbs to grass edge, white lining to define existing parking bays (e) resurfacing and maximising all space for parking, improving boundary and pedestrian connection. improved public road safety at the facility. In accordance with Article 81(3) (ca) and 120 (1B) (b)(i) of the above-mentioned regulations, Monaghan Co. Co., as the competent authority, has concluded from a Screening Determination, which is based on an examination of the nature, size and location of the proposed development, that there is no real likelihood of significant effects on he environment arising from the proposed development, and as such has determined an Environmental Impact Assessment is not required. The Screening Determination is available for inspection, and at any time before the expiration of 4 weeks from the date of publication of this notice (21/11/22), any person may apply to An Bord Pleanála for a screening determination as to whether the proposed development would be likely to have significant effects on the environment. In accordance with Article 250 (1) (ca) of the above-mentioned regulations, Monaghan Co. Co., as the competent authority, has concluded from a Screening Determination, which is based on an assessment of best scientific knowledge, that the proposed development, either individually or in combination with other plans or projects, is not likely to have significant effects on a European site, and as such has determined that an Appropriate Assessment is not required. The Screening Determination is available for inspection, any person may apply to An Bord Pleanála for a screening determination as to whether the proposed development would be likely to have significant effect on a European site.
Permission for development consisting of a glamping site consisting of 8 no. single storey glamping pods, treatment plant, percolation area, new entrance, pedestrian crossing and all associated site works
Permission to retain as construct bungalow style dwelling house previously approved under P. 81/423 together with all ancillary site works
Permission to erect a two storey dwelling house, insert a filter unit and percolation area and exit on to public road
Permission to extend and refurbish existing building to provide new gym, Toilets, Dressing rooms, Store, Treatment room and Kitchen, Ball skills wall and make alterations at exit onto public road to improve sight vision
Permission to extend existing car parking areas, insert new floodlighting that will not interfere with bat or bird life, provide solar panels to existing building and provide new maintenance equipment store. Enhance the environmental properties of the site by providing low mov management, planting of suitable native broad leaf trees, creation of bee nesting habitat suitable for solidary bees and exit on to public road by way of existing entrance. Significant further information received in relation to drainage design report and site specific flood risk assessment
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 300 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 228009The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief