Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
6% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 176 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 5 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
5 structured nearby appeal records.
5 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
A) construction of a machinery shed b) construction of an agricultural livestock shed to include cubicles, feed area and underground slatted slurry storage tanks c) construction of a roofed dungstead and all associated siteworks
RETENTION PERMISSION for (a) RETENTION of existing cubicle & feeding sheds & underground slatted slurry storage tank & slurry channel and PLANNING PERMISSION for (b) Demolition of existing dairy, milking parlour, straw bedded pens & underground parlour washings tank; (c) Construction of an agricultural building to include milking parlour, dairy, straw bedded pens, waiting yard, underground slatted soiled water storage tanks and livestock handling & drafting facilities; (d) Relocation of existing meal bin and erection of water storage tank and all associated siteworks
Retention planning permission is sought for the as constructed (1) first floor habitable space (2) alterations to the roofline (3) windows and velux type windows at first floor level, (4) porch and (5) garage. This is a change from the original planning permission P.D. 98/646 and Planning Permission for (1) the construction of a new single storey extension to the existing house and (2) a change of site boundaries
For Demolition of existing collecting yard, construction of slatted slurry tank, silage slab and silage apron and associated works
To construct a slatted cubicle shed, extend existing collecting yard, a new slatted tank in collecting yard and all ancillary site works
For Single storey Dwelling together with a detached Garage, new entrance, bore well, septic tank, percolation area and ancillary site works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 176 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2660125The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief