Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage16 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
16 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 4,760 decisions within 5 km, 16 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1284 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
16 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
16 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for South Dublin County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for South Dublin County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
3 of 4 layers are loaded for South Dublin County Council and were intersected with the site; flood is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
3 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
1284 structured nearby appeal records.
1,284 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the South Dublin County Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
Detached gym and utility room in rear garden with connection to existing services and all associated site works.
Retention for existing front single storey porch to dwelling.
The installation of a pedestrian gate at an existing pedestrian access point to a residential development.
The development requiring retention permission consists of the construction of a utility shed in the rear garden
Conversion of existing attic space comprising of modification of existing roof structure, new gable window, new access stairs and flat roof dormer to the rear.
Demolish garden shed and construct single storey rear & side extension for kitchen/dining, utility & bedroom c/w roof lights.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 4,760 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record SD22B/0457The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief