Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage7 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
7 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
6% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 305 decisions within 5 km, 7 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 14 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
7 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
7 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Tipperary County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Tipperary County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Tipperary County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
14 structured nearby appeal records.
14 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Tipperary County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
1. an existing first floor residential extension to the rear of their dwelling and all associated works, 2. the erection of rear garden walls and for Planning Permission to 3. construct a rear window skylight to the existing first floor rear elevation on their property. The works as listed above are located within the curtilage of Record of Protected Structures (RPS) Cashel Town Walls RPS No. 7
The extension erected at the rear off our dwelling house
A) demolition of existing flat roof extension to the rear of existing dwelling, b)demolition of existing sheds on site, c) and permission to construct a new extension to the rear of existing dwelling and all associated site-works
(i) replace the streetscape windows to the existing dwelling & (ii) the construction of a new extension to the rear of the dwelling and all associated site works
Change of use from domestic dwelling to bed and breakfast (a protected structure)
A single storey extension to rear of existing dwelling house which is a protected structure (Protected Structure Ref: 102, NIAH: 22105063) including demolition of existing adjoining outbuilding, upgrading and refurbishment of existing separate outbuilding, internal remodelling at ground floor level, landscaping works and all necessary siteworks
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 305 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 19600296The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief