Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage7 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
7 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
3% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 540 decisions within 5 km, 7 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 22 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
7 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
7 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Tipperary County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Tipperary County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Tipperary County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
22 structured nearby appeal records.
22 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Tipperary County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
1. Retain and complete the roof with blue black slates (as a replacement for an old, damaged, corrugated galvanised mild steel roof), 2. Retain a 100mm concrete block wall complete with two doors and three windows on the east south east elevation
New shop front to replace existing shop front including new windows and doors
For development comprising of the following works within the curtilage of Protected Structure No. 91; (a) Demolition of existing single storey structures to rear of existing dwelling at No. 32 Summerhill (b) Demolition of portion of single storey extension to side of No. 31 Summerhill to create new vehicular access to No. 32 and demolition of existing steel shed to rear of No. 31 to provide new garden/rear parking area to No. 32 Summerhill (c) Alterations to No. 32 Summerhill, including erection of part 2 Storey, part single storey extensions to side and rear of existing dwelling (d) All associated ancillary site works and services
The construction of two dwelling houses and all ancillary site works
1) change of use from offices to residential, 2) reconfiguration of internal rooms of both floors of the protected structure, 3) replacement of the non original aluminium windows with traditional timber sash windows on the front elevation of the building, 4) alteration and addition of window opes to the rear portion of the building and replacement of all windows, 5) additional of three rooflights to the rear portion of the building, 6) raising the flat roof of the rear portion of the building by 400 mm to allow for a shallow pitch, 7) removal of an existing 1970's toilet block with the courtyard of the existing building, 8) reinstatement of garden boundary wall, side access gate and all associated site works to facilitate the works on and under the lands - protected structure
Change of use from retail unit to restaurant for the sale of hot food on and off the premises, refurbish existing shop front and provide new name plate
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 540 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 19600390The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief