Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
5% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 309 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 11 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Tipperary County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Tipperary County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Tipperary County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
11 structured nearby appeal records.
11 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Tipperary County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
1) bedroom and en-suite 2) carport and garage 3) lean-to canopy
A) Permission for Retention of part of the extension at east side of the house, b) Permission for Retention of two bay windows to the rear of the house, c) Permission to remove existing door on front elevation and block up, d) Permission for demolition of part of existing unauthorised extension to the east side of the house, e) Permission to incorporate a door in existing bay window at the rear of the house, f) Alterations to existing roof and all associated siteworks as may be required
To construct extension to existing two storey dwelling comprising of a single storey extension to side and new boundary wall, also a porch to front
Change of use from store associated with recreation centre to children's pre-school and Permission for enclosed external children's play area and all associated site and ancillary works
Construct a single storey extension to the side of my dwelling consisting of a bedroom and en-suite bathroom
Change of use of existing detached domestic garage to residential use and demolition of walls, alteration and extension to existing garage to form a residential use and increased roof height to same
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 309 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 19601094The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief