Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage28 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
28 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
5% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 758 decisions within 5 km, 28 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 57 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
28 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
28 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Tipperary County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Tipperary County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Tipperary County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
57 structured nearby appeal records.
57 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Tipperary County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
(a) change of use from retail to Class 2 banking use of the ground and first floors (131 m2) and (b) new halo-illuminated signage including an internally illuminated double sided projecting sign
(i) the change of use of the existing first and second floors of a building from commercial to residential comprising 3 no. apartment units, (ii) to make elevational amendments to the rear of the building, (iii) to install balconies to the rear of the building, (iv) for the on-site parking area for apartments and (v) all associated site development works
Modifications to the front elevation of our building including new pedestrian entrance, replacement shopfront and all associated site development works
Change of use from retail to deli style restaurant/café, new shop front, signage and all associated site development works including minor modifications to the existing building formerly Carl Scarpa
New external signage and lighting to external front façade alterations to existing main entrance including provision of new sliding glass door, and new single storey, glazed link between post house building and adjacent proposed medical centre permitted under planning ref:18601517, via existing courtyard; and Planning Permission for permanent Retention of lift from ground floor to first floor mezzanine and fire escape stairs, together with all other associated site works. This is a protected structure RPS Ref 102, NIAH Ref 22117025
The rear balcony serving the third floor (top floor) apartment and the access door to same including all associated site development works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 758 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 19601245The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief