Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage22 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
22 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
19 BRIDGE STREET , WESTPORT
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
10% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 733 decisions within 5 km, 22 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 54 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 20847
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Confirmed coverageOne current citation from the Mayo County Council development plan, with section, page and source URL.
1 matchedFlood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Mayo County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage54 structured nearby appeal records.
54 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Mayo County Council development plan.
1 matched733Nearby applications
22Site-linked candidates
10%Nearby refused
54Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
20847
RETAIN SHOPFRONT AS CONSTRUCTED (PROTECTED STRUCTURE WITH RPS NO. 040 AND IS LOCATED WITHIN AN ARCHITECTURAL CONSERVATION AREA.
22946
RETAIN THE ALTERATIONS OF GROUND AND FIRST FLOOR APARTMENTS TOGETHER WITH ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS ORIGINAL PLANNING PERMISSION PD1352 REFERS
211017
INSTALLATION OF AN ATM MACHINE TO THE EXISTING SHOP FRONT TO THE SOUTH-WEST ELEVATION
18108
CHANGE OF USE FROM COMMERCIAL/RETAIL UNIT TO TATTOO PARLOUR TOGETHER WITH ASSOCIATED SITE SERVICES
2029
RETAIN THE USE OF THE PREMISES AS A RESTAURANT PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED AS A DOCTOR'S SURGERY UNDER P98/1890, APPLICATION TO INCLUDE ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS
20293
RETAIN THE USE OF NO. 3 MARKET LANE AS A RESTAURANT WITH MINOR INTERNAL ALTERATIONS AND TO RETAIN THE USE OF THE AMALGAMATED UNITS NO. 5 & NO. 6 MARKET LANE AS A RESTAURANT INCLUDING ALL ANCILLARY SITE WORKS
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 733 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 20847The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief