Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
19% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 371 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 216 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
216 structured nearby appeal records.
216 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
The construction of a dormer type single-family dwelling, demolition of an existing derelict structure on site, alteration to the front boundary wall, new site entrance and all ancillary site works
Sub-divide existing site to facilitate two serviced sites including connection to public services, new entrance onto public road, boundary treatment, landscaping and all associated site works
Sub-divide my existing site to facilitate two serviced sites including connection to public services, new entrance onto public road, boundary treatment, landscaping and all associated site works
For sub division of an existing rear garden to create two separate private amenity spaces, 'private amenity space A' will be attached to Cottage No. 1, The Village (A Protected Structure) and 'Private Amenity Space B' will be provided for The Pilot House, an existing residential unit within the curtilage of Cottage 1. Permission is also sought to construct a single storey extension of 23 square metres, to the Pilot House to bring the total floor area to 45 square metres along with associated development works to facilitate the development of
The indefinite retention of the sub-division of the existing site, together with indefinite retention of elevational alterations to the rear of The Pilot House (PROTECTED STRUCTURE)
To construct a Wheelchair Accessible Ramp Access with Entrance gate and associated works to access proposed Pontoon Facility. An NIS (Natura Impact Statement) accompanies this Planning Application at
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 371 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 21951The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief