Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage1 register record is within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
1 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
PORTERSLAND & BENNETSKNOCK, NEW ROSS RURAL
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
16% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 531 decisions within 5 km, 1 exact-site or onsite candidate record, and 704 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 20180936
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage704 structured nearby appeal records.
704 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
531Nearby applications
1Site-linked candidates
16%Nearby refused
704Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
20180936
PERMISSION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT: TWO STOREY RETAIL
20211542
Permission for retention for development at a 0.014 ha site in the car park of T
20180560
PERMISSION IS SOUGHT FOR THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT: CHANGE OF USE OF 599 SQ. M.
20241357
Permission for development which will consist of a single storey drive-thru
20200848
Permission for development for amalgamation and change of use of existing single
20181800
PERMISSION FOR A CHANGE OF USE OF UNIT 4 FROM RETAIL WAREHOUSE TO CONVENIENCE
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 531 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 20180936The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief