Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
ANNAGH LOWER, WINGFIELD
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
21% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 332 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 491 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 20191582
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage491 structured nearby appeal records.
491 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
332Nearby applications
3Site-linked candidates
21%Nearby refused
491Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
20191582
PERMISSION TO (1) ERECT A STEEL FRAMED MILKING PARLOUR SHED UNIT AND (2) DECOMMI
20190944
PERMISSION TO ERECT AN EXTENSION TO EXISTING MILKING PARLOUR AND ALL ASSOCIATED
20180659
PERMISSION TO (1) RECONSTRUCT STORM-DAMAGED ROOFS TO AGRICULTURAL SHEDS WITHIN F
20210924
Permission to demolish existing domestic garage and erect a domestic garage as a
20221302
Permission for retention of alterations to existing dwelling as a change to that
20240177
Permission to construct a two-storey dwelling with services,
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 332 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 20191582The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief