GrantedDecided 20 May 2026Dublin City Council

Unit 39, O'Casey Avenue, Park West Industrial Park, Dublin 12, D12RY23

Planning application WEB1714/26
DecisionGrant permission
Decided20 May 2026
Application typePermission
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dublin City Council.
Planning permission is sought by Silent-Aire Europe Limited for provision of 3 no. fire exit doors, 2no. to the front elevation and 1 no. to the rear elevation and replacement of an existing roller shutter door with a new roller shutter door (size: 6m x 8m) at the front elevation and other associated ancillary works all at Unit 39, O'Casey Avenue, Dublin, Dublin City, D12RY23.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Dublin City has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Unit 39, O'Casey Avenue, Park West Industrial Park, Dublin 12, D12RY23?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →