10, 12, 14a, 14 (a protected structure), 16, 18 and 20 Uppe... — planning permission granted (F12A/0225/E1) / PlanIntel

Proposed development

Application description published by Fingal County Council.

Permission for development at this site at no. 10, 12, 14a and 14 (whi

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Application ref: F12A/0225/E1
Received: 20 September 2017
Decided: 13 November 2017
FI requested: Yes

Authority: Fingal County Council
Application type: Extension Of Duration Of Permission
Outcome: Grant extension of duration of perm.
Source status: Documents indexed. Extraction pending for this record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 10, 12, 14a, 14 (a protected structure), 16, 18 and 20 Upper Main Stre?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Get my site risk brief

Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Included in site brief

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Unlock for €39 incl. VAT Or read every file with Pro

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.

Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →