GrantedDecided 17 November 2020Fingal County Council

Lands located at, Oberstown, Lusk, Co Dublin

Planning application F19A/0532
DecisionGrant outline permission
Decided17 November 2020
Application typeOutline Permission
Source documents21

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons18conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Fingal County Council.
Development consisting of the following: (i) Construction of 5 no. dor

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

  • 1Development in accordance with lodged plans/particulars and significant additional info received 1 Oct 2020.Compliance
  • 2Permits outline permission for 6 no. detached dormer dwellings, new entrance, internal road, on-site wastewater, SuDS, ancillary works.Compliance
  • 3Permission consequent only for dwellings on single plots to applicants complying with Rural Settlement Strategy.Compliance
  • 4Layout as per Drawing No. 2019-014-AI-200.Compliance
  • 5Occupancy restricted to applicant/immediate family for min 7 years.Occupancy
  • 6No dwelling constructed until internal access road and entrance onto L1190 completed.Construction Management
  • 7Consequent plans must show layout/driveways/drainage; detached, single/storey & half, max ridge 6.8m, max floor area 180 sqm; natural slate roof (blue/black), neutral render/natural stone walls; varied ridge height/elevational design; parking for 2 cars with turning area.Design Materials
  • 8Access: Materials meet taking in charge standards; front boundary max 0.9m height within 3m of access; visibility triangle clear at L1190 entrance, corner radii max 6m; gradient max 2.5% over last 6m; ditch piped; stormwater disposed within site; services relocated at developer's expense.Traffic Access
  • 9Foul/surface water drainage: No foul into surface water; comply with EPA Code of Practice 2009. No surface water into foul sewer; comply with Greater Dublin Regional Code of Practice for Drainage Works v6.0.Wastewater Drainage
  • 10Install O'Reilly Oakstown BAF packaged WWTS (6PE) and minimum 90m² soil polishing filter per EPA COP 2009 & EN-12566-3. Works supervised/certified by qualified person. Regular inspection and desludging required.Wastewater Drainage
  • 11Enter into water/wastewater connection agreement(s) with Irish Water prior to commencement and comply with all IW standards, codes, and practices.Water Services
  • 12Boundary treatments as per Drawing No. 2019-014-AI-200.Landscaping Boundary

Planning a project near Lands located at, Oberstown, Lusk, Co Dublin?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 155 pages of searchable text on file.

21 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 16 documents.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

21 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →