GrantedDecided 10 February 2022Galway City Council

Rear of Forster Street House, 48 Forster Street & fronting on to Lough Atalia, Galway

Planning application 21102
DecisionConditional grant
Decided10 February 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Galway City Council.
Permission for development which will consist of development at rear of Forster Street House (a protected structure RPS No.4305 under Galway City Development Plan), and fronting on to Lough Atalia, Galway; the development will consist of a 6 storey plus penthouse level apartment building comprising 18 no. units, 12 no. 2 bed and 6 no. 1 bed, open space, landscaping, car parking and all associated site works and services

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
312943-22Submitted 08 March 2022 / decided 23 April 2024
Status not recordedCONDITIONAL
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Galway City has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Rear of Forster Street House, 48 Forster Street & fronting on to Lough Atalia, Galway?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →