GrantedDecided 22 January 2026Galway City Council

The Galmont Hotel, Lough Atalia Road, Galway

Planning application 2560259
DecisionConditional grant
Decided22 January 2026
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Galway City Council.
Permission for development which consists of: development as described in the previously granted planning application (Ref. No. in Planning Register: 20/197) been, a) demolition of 2 no. hotel bedrooms at second and third floor of the east wing, b) a linking extension at second floor between the north and east wing, c) a bedroom and linking extension at third and fourth floor, which includes 14 no. hotel bedrooms to the north and east wing, d) associated elevational changes and e) all associated site works and services at the Galmont Hotel, Lough Atalia Rd.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Galway City has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near The Galmont Hotel, Lough Atalia Road, Galway?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →