RefusedDecided 23 July 2024Galway County Council

Connemara National Park, Letterfrack, Galway

Planning application 2460734
DecisionRefused
Decided23 July 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Galway County Council.
For the 1) construction of a maintenance shed measuring 576sqm. Gross floor area (GFA). The proposed shed will have a maximum overall height of 7.35m, width of 20m and length of 28.8m and include a 4m concrete hardstanding apron around the shed 2) The provision of drainage equipment on the subject site. 3) The installation of a drainage pond and associated works. 4) Access road linking shed to existing minor road. 5)Alterations to access road from the N29, including: a. The widening of the existing access junction, b. Section of existing stone wall to be removed and rebuilt 1m back from existing position to allow for site visibility. 6)All other associated and ancillary works. Gross floor space of proposed works: 576 sqm. A Natura Impact Statement (NIS) has been prepared and accompanies the planning application.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Galway has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Connemara National Park, Letterfrack, Galway?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →