RefusedDecided 10 October 2017Kildare County Council

Kilcullen Mart, Newbridge Road, Kilcullen

Planning application 17919
DecisionRefused
Decided10 October 2017
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
To construct a 21m high telecommunications monopole support structure carrying shrouded antennas and transmission dish, with associated equipment units and security fencing

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
300102-17Submitted 07 November 2017 / decided 01 June 2018
Status not recordedCONDITIONAL
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference 300102-17
    07 November 2017
  2. Appeal decisionCONDITIONAL
    01 June 2018
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Kilcullen Mart, Newbridge Road, Kilcullen?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →