GrantedDecided 12 November 2019Kildare County Council

Seville House, Butterstream, Clane

Planning application 191047
DecisionConditional grant
Decided12 November 2019
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
1) Alteration of sunroom to side of dwelling. 2) Extension of porch on ground floor and bedroom on 1st floor to front of dwelling. 3) Extension of previous building line to North East side on ground and 1st floor. 4) Conversion of previous granted garage on ground floor to habitable space within the building line. 5) Conversion of part 1st floor attic to accessible storage space. 6) Insertion of Velux windows on front and rear slope in newly created accessible storage space on 1st floor. 7) Alteration to windows in property as shown. 8) Construction of detached garage on site

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Seville House, Butterstream, Clane?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →