GrantedDecided 15 December 2020Kildare County Council

29 Parklands Lawns, Maynooth, Co. Kildare W23 N9Y0.

Planning application 201287
DecisionConditional grant
Decided15 December 2020
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
To demolish existing single storey rear extension, and existing pitched roof over side extension. Construct a front entrance porch, first floor front and side extension, single storey rear and partial side extension. Widen vehicular access to 3500mm. New windows to left side southerly elevation on existing ground and first floor levels, new windows on existing first floor rear elevation, and new windows on right side northerly elevation on ground floor, new stainless steel flue pipe from stove to rear right corner of house

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 29 Parklands Lawns, Maynooth, Co. Kildare W23 N9Y0.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →