GrantedDecided 23 August 2024Kildare County Council

Graigues, Robertstown, Co. Kildare

Planning application 2460618
DecisionConditional grant
Decided23 August 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
For (A) erection of single storey type house, previously granted under file ref. 21/1332, (B) garage/fuel store for domestic use, previously granted under file ref. 21/1332, (C) installation of proprietary wastewater treatment system with percolation area. The existing top soil under the proposed percolation area is to be replaced with the importation of soil with a T-value of less than 30 previously granted under file ref. 21/1332, and (D) recessed vehicular entrance onto the public road, previously granted under file ref. 21/1332, and all associated site development works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Graigues, Robertstown, Co. Kildare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →