GrantedDecided 11 June 2018Kilkenny County Council

Sugarstown, Thomastown, Co. Kilkenny

Planning application 18253
DecisionConditional grant
Decided11 June 2018
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kilkenny County Council.
Of Planning Permission reference P99/92 is sought for alterations to existing as built dwelling house, entrance, driveway, septic tank and percolation area including all ancillary services. The Retention application is for the following alterations: 1. Detached as built single storey rear garden shed/store. 2. Single storey as built boiler house to side of existing dwelling house. 3. Sun/dining room extension to rear of property. 4. As constructed and located Septic Tank and Percolation Area at rear of site. 5. Site boundaries alterations from original granted planning permission ref P99/92 at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kilkenny has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Sugarstown, Thomastown, Co. Kilkenny?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →