GrantedDecided 17 September 2020Limerick County Council

Engine, Upper Cecil St., Limerick.

Planning application 208001
DecisionConditional grant
Decided17 September 2020
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Limerick County Council.
(a) extension to existing Engine Building to consist of the provision of 1254 sqm. of digital collaboration space facing onto Dominick Street, (b) comprising of collaboration space on ground and first floor, office accommodation on second floor and meeting/conference suite on third floor, (c) plant room and garden area at roof level of existing building on Cecil Street, (d) hard and soft landscaping to rear courtyard, (e) connection to existing site services, (f) all associated site works. The site is located within an Architectural Conservaion Area ACA 1A South City Centre & Newtown Pery

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Limerick has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Engine, Upper Cecil St., Limerick.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →