GrantedDecided 21 September 2017Louth County Council

Smarmore, Ardee, Co Louth

Planning application 17405
DecisionConditional grant
Decided21 September 2017
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Permission to consist of retention of dwelling and associated works as constructed with changes to granted permission Ref. No. 07/838 (1) relocation of house (2) increased height of house (3) relocation of site boundaries, (4) relocation of waste water system together with permission to convert existing attic space to habitable accommodation, proposed soil polishing filter to serve development and all associated works. The development is located within the grounds of a Protected Structure Ref Lhs 017-050 'Smarmore Castle'. *Significant Further Information submitted 06/09/17*

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Smarmore, Ardee, Co Louth?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →