GrantedDecided 14 June 2018Louth County Council

Smarmore Castle, Smarmore, Ardee

Planning application 17894
DecisionConditional grant
Decided14 June 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Permission to erect 14 no. individual habitable self-contained units within an enclosed walled garden area with connection to the existing waste water treatment facility and all associated site works and services. The development will also consist of the change of use of one number two storey agricultural storage outbuilding and one number single storey outbuilding both to that of office and medical examination space, with window and door openings to these structures. The works to be carried out are to protected structure RPS No: LHS 017-050 and monument RMP No: LHS 017-066.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Smarmore Castle, Smarmore, Ardee?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →