GrantedDecided 15 September 2017Louth County Council

Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Windwill Road, Drogheda

Planning application 17577
DecisionConditional grant
Decided15 September 2017
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Louth County Council.
Retention permission for minor modifications to already approved development (planning register reference number 1371) at this site. The modifications consist of extension of glazed by-pass link corridor located on the existing hospital façade (13.7m2 extension to 1st floor and 43.7m2 on 2nd, 3rd and 4th floors). Services alterations to include UPS plant room 110.8m2 at 5th floor. Minor elevational changes to 2no. louvres at 5th floor east elevation and 4no. windows at 4th floor south elevation. Ancillary site works to suit.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Louth has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Windwill Road, Drogheda?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →