GrantedDecided 21 February 2024Meath County Council

Units 17 & 18 Ashbourne Retail Park, Ashbourne, Co. Meath

Planning application 2360504
DecisionConditional grant
Decided21 February 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Meath County Council.
Pargo Properties One Ltd. intend to apply for planning permission for a change of use from vacant café/restaurant to retail warehouse at Unit 17 and from storage area to retail warehouse in the Ashbourne Retail Park, Ashbourne, Co. Meath. It is also proposed to amalgamate Unit 17 and the storage area with Unit 18 to form one larger retail warehouse unit. The proposed development includes for a new fire exit door to the rear of the unit and internal alterations to the existing floor layout to provide for the proposed amalgamated retail warehouse unit. The proposed development will result in a total gross floor area of c. 850.5 sq.m. There are no changes to the front elevation as part of the proposed development for the subject unit. The development includes all ancillary works to facilitate the development.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Meath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Units 17 & 18 Ashbourne Retail Park, Ashbourne, Co. Meath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →