RefusedDecided 30 January 2019Roscommon County Council

The Maples, Lisroyne, Strokestown

Planning application 18585
DecisionRefused
Decided30 January 2019
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Roscommon County Council.
For the proposed construction of 7 no. dwelling houses consisting of 5 no. storey and a half type detached dwelling houses, all of which are of the same design as were previously granted full planning permission under planning reference numbers PD/04/2173 together with the proposesd construction of 2 no. two bedroom bungalow type dwelling houses, proposed connection to the existing foul sewer surface water and watermain networks which service the existing estate known as The Maples and all ancillary site works at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-303782-19Submitted 21 February 2019 / decided 25 June 2019
Status not recordedREFUSED
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Roscommon has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near The Maples, Lisroyne, Strokestown?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →