RefusedDecided 20 February 2026Roscommon County Council

Lisnaree, Lisroyne Strokestown, Co. Roscommon.

Planning application 2560598
DecisionRefused
Decided20 February 2026
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Roscommon County Council.
Permission for proposed alteration of a previously permitted residential development which was granted full planning permission under planning reference numbers PD/24/60235 and PD/25/60047, to now include for the proposed construction of a two bedroom bungalow type dwelling house together with vehicular entrance and connection to all existing services all of which is the same design and at the same location as what was previously granted full planning permission under planning reference number PD/17/2 at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL-500899-RN-26Submitted 04 March 2026 / decided 30 June 2026
Status not recordedCONDITIONAL
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Roscommon has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Lisnaree, Lisroyne Strokestown, Co. Roscommon.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →