GrantedDecided 15 June 2020Tipperary County Council

No. 5 Main Street, (formerly First Editions), Tipperary Town

Planning application 19601297
DecisionConditional grant
Decided15 June 2020
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Tipperary County Council.
Change of use of the existing ground floor retail area to café/deli and change of use of first and second floor residential accommodation to office use. The proposed development also includes the demolition of existing ground floor toilet and store to the rear of the ground floor, the construction of office/store rear extension at first floor level and the replacement of an existing cantilevered bathroom at second floor level with a toilet rear extension. This building is a protected structure (Protected Structure RPS No. 62, NIAH Ref: 22108062

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Tipperary has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near No. 5 Main Street, (formerly First Editions), Tipperary Town?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →