Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage82 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
82 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
14% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 867 decisions within 5 km, 82 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 60 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
82 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
82 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Waterford City and County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
60 structured nearby appeal records.
60 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Waterford City and County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
To carry out a change of use from retail to residential to include internal alteration works
SECTION 254 - Two benches under windows
SECTION 254 LICENCE for 1 dining area with surrounding screen shelter and canopy covering from rain only and 6 tall tables (no seating capacity, 2 persons per table; total capacity 12 persons) and 3 semi circle Shannon tall table tops (no seating capacity, 2 persons standing per table; total capacity 6 persons to be directly attached to the poles/bollards on the footpath directly outside Jitterbeans
Section 254 Licence application of 2 picnic tables (capacity 6 persons per table) Located outside Deli as was permitted in 2021. Seasonal; required from March to September)
SECTION 254 LICENCE for outdoor dining area - 6 tables (capacity 2 persons per table; total capacity 12 persons) located outside deli as was permitted in 2021
Section 254 Licence Application - outdoor dining at the following 2 locations - Location 1; dining area with surrounding screen shelter and canopy covering from rain only and 6 tall tables - located opposite Jitterbeans Deli and 2 carpark spaces outside Credit Union and James Mans Shop, 2-3 Parnell Street. Location 2: - 3 x semi circle Shannon tall table tops to be directly attached to the poles/bollards on the footpath directly outside Jitterbeans Deli Shop on 65 Main Street, Dungarvan, to be off set from the road side of the bollard
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 867 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2460598The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief