GrantedDecided 08 March 2023Carlow County Council

Kilcarrig, Bagnelstown, Co. Carlow

Planning application 22118
DecisionConditional grant
Decided08 March 2023
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents5

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Carlow County Council.
The proposed works will include a solar farm on an area of approximately 14.16 hectares, comprising photovoltaic panels on ground mounted frames, 4 no. single storey inverter/transformer stations, 1 no. single storey terminal stations, 1 no. single storey electrical switch room, 1 no. storage container, security fencing, CCTV and all associated ancillary development works. Elgin Energy Services Ltd. are applying for the proposed solar farm to have planning permission that is effective for 10 years (and an operation period of 40 years)

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Low OCR quality: verify against source documents

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Kilcarrig, Bagnelstown, Co. Carlow?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →