GrantedDecided 09 February 2011Cork County Council

Greenwood Unit Cobh Cross Ind. Est. Carrigtohill

Planning application 10/8691
DecisionConditional grant
Decided09 February 2011
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Permission for retention for development (change of use and as constructed mezzanine floor) and permission for development (new exterior facade) at a site of approximately 1,186.5sq.m. The development consists of:- (A) The retention of the change of use (approximately 584.5 sq.m) at ground floor from Warehousing (as permitted under Reg. Ref. No. 4443/79) to Retail Warehousing and the retention of the mezzanine storage floor (approximately 531 sq.m), and (B) The construction of a new exterior facade and 8 no. reconfigured entrances (approximately 38 sq.m)

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Greenwood Unit Cobh Cross Ind. Est. Carrigtohill?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →